Monolingual comparative normativity in bilingualism research is out of “<i>control</i>”: Arguments and alternatives

Abstract Herein, we contextualize, problematize, and offer some insights for moving beyond the problem of monolingual comparative normativity in (psycho) linguistic research on bilingualism. We argue that, vast majority cases, juxtaposing (functional) monolinguals to bilinguals fails what comparison is supposedly intended do: meet standards empirical control line with scientific method. Instead, default nature has historically contributed inequalities many facets bilingualism continues impede progress multiple levels. Beyond framing our views matter, epistemological considerations methodological alternatives this standard practice that improve rigor while fostering increased diversity, inclusivity, equity field.